<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Performance Reviews &#8212; Keep it focused</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.earnedlessons.com/2009/04/14/performance-reviews-keep-it-focused/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.earnedlessons.com/2009/04/14/performance-reviews-keep-it-focused/</link>
	<description>Customer Joy. Employee Success. Investor Wealth.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 16:46:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Linden</title>
		<link>http://www.earnedlessons.com/2009/04/14/performance-reviews-keep-it-focused/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Linden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 16:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.earnedlessons.com/?p=209#comment-26</guid>
		<description>The HBS article understates the amount of data arguing for the ineffectiveness of tying pay to performance (e.g. forced rank).  A good book summarizing that work is The Human Equation.

Briefly, the problem is that forced rank and similar systems create a zero sum game where employee is pitted against employee.  It creates a system where people can win by tearing others down inside the company rather than focusing their efforts on working together to compete against those outside the company.

Combine this with the fact that managers rarely are able to do performance reviews correctly -- due to lack of information and gaming of the system -- and you have a recipe for disaster.

In the end, forced rank typically hurts morale and aggravates attrition because no one perceives it as fairly and correctly done.

A good alternative is to use performance reviews solely to help people improve their skills, give non-monetary compensation for individual rewards, and focus monetary compensation on rewarding teams.

If you&#039;re interested in details, there is much more on that in The Human Equation, Strategic Human Resources, and other good books on human resource management.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The HBS article understates the amount of data arguing for the ineffectiveness of tying pay to performance (e.g. forced rank).  A good book summarizing that work is The Human Equation.</p>
<p>Briefly, the problem is that forced rank and similar systems create a zero sum game where employee is pitted against employee.  It creates a system where people can win by tearing others down inside the company rather than focusing their efforts on working together to compete against those outside the company.</p>
<p>Combine this with the fact that managers rarely are able to do performance reviews correctly &#8212; due to lack of information and gaming of the system &#8212; and you have a recipe for disaster.</p>
<p>In the end, forced rank typically hurts morale and aggravates attrition because no one perceives it as fairly and correctly done.</p>
<p>A good alternative is to use performance reviews solely to help people improve their skills, give non-monetary compensation for individual rewards, and focus monetary compensation on rewarding teams.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re interested in details, there is much more on that in The Human Equation, Strategic Human Resources, and other good books on human resource management.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ruben</title>
		<link>http://www.earnedlessons.com/2009/04/14/performance-reviews-keep-it-focused/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>ruben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.earnedlessons.com/?p=209#comment-23</guid>
		<description>I have used parts of the idea in some organizations to good effect, but I have not seen it completely executed and would really like to have it happen as it &quot;only makes sense&quot;. The extra overhead for management is only that they keep better calendaring of which review should happen when, other than that it is just a case of execution. (You know. The hard part :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used parts of the idea in some organizations to good effect, but I have not seen it completely executed and would really like to have it happen as it &#8220;only makes sense&#8221;. The extra overhead for management is only that they keep better calendaring of which review should happen when, other than that it is just a case of execution. (You know. The hard part <img src='http://www.earnedlessons.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Chien</title>
		<link>http://www.earnedlessons.com/2009/04/14/performance-reviews-keep-it-focused/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Chien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 05:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.earnedlessons.com/?p=209#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Totally agree. Have you actually seen your suggestion in practice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree. Have you actually seen your suggestion in practice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
